Use of multiple monitoring tools restricts visibility
Alpiq is a Swiss energy services provider and electricity producer that specializes in trading and power production. The company has generated climate-friendly and sustainable electricity from carbon-free Swiss hydropower for more than a hundred years. Today, Alpiq uses digital tools to optimize electricity generation and consumption as well as energy flow between producers, prosumers, and consumers to stabilize the electricity grids.
Amine Ajil, Head of Integrations, leads a small team of five responsible for Alpiq’s integration platform and API implementation. The company previously used more than five separate monitoring solutions, which reduced productivity, increased costs, and prevented Ajil’s team from achieving full end-to-end visibility. Ajil sought to adopt a monitoring solution that could enable his team to monitor everything in one place and could be used company-wide.
At the same time, Alpiq was working to become a cloud-first company as part of its overall mission to improve agility and user experience. Two years ago, Alpiq adopted Datadog as its company-wide observability platform as part of a broader cloud migration and tool consolidation strategy. As a result, Ajil’s team faced the dual challenge of migrating from Tibco, an on-premises integration platform, to the cloud-based Anypoint Platform by MuleSoft while also finding the optimal approach to enable MuleSoft monitoring within the Datadog environment. “We considered building our own monitoring tool, but we didn’t have a dedicated team for such development, so the maintenance would have been complex,” says Ajil.
Without proper visibility into its integration platform’s performance, Ajil’s team—which provides services for almost the entire company and connects all its critical applications—would struggle to promptly integrate apps and troubleshoot issues, potentially impacting essential functions like trading and power plant operations.